Last year, I published a blog post on figure caption color indicators. The positive feedback I received on it from a number of individuals prompted me to revisit the subject. At the time, I did not have a good way of locating published examples of such caption indicators and was only able to locate a few published examples with shape indicators but none with color indicators. When thinking about revisiting the subject, I had the epiphany that although searching for such indicators in the published literature is next to impossible, searching in the LaTeX source markup for papers is not. As arXiv provides bulk access to the TeX source markup for its pre-prints, this provided a large corpus of manuscripts to search through. After finding examples in pre-prints, I was then able to see if the indicators survived the publication process and was thereby able to locate well over one hundred examples of color line or shape indicators in the figure captions of published academic papers. Continue reading
Although slowly improving, typography on the web pages is considerably lower quality than that of high-quality print / PDF typography, such as that produced by LaTeX or Adobe InDesign. In particular, line breaks and hyphenation need considerable improvement. While CSS originally never specified what sort of line breaking algorithm should be used, browsers all converged on greedy line breaking, which produces poor-quality typography but is fast, simple, and stable. CSS Text Module Level 4 standardizes the current behavior as the default with a
text-wrap property while introducing a
pretty option, which instructs the browser to use a higher quality line breaking algorithm. However, as of the time of writing, no browsers supported this property.
Sometime last year, the Shop & Shop and Giant (of Landover) grocery store chains began introducing redesigned packaging for their store brand products. The two chains share a parent company and share branding, so the labels only use the shared logo without a brand name. The old label designs heavily featured a white background, which made them easy to locate in the store.1 The new brand identity is less distinct, but whether it’s better or worse is a matter of taste. However, there are specific design decisions that were made on some of the labels that have fundamental issues.
In particular, I will focus on the labels for canned vegetables. As one would expect, both the old and new label designs feature the name of the vegetable along with a picture of a “serving suggestion.” Since many vegetables are similar in color, it is often easier to find one’s desired vegetable on the shelf by looking for the name, especially when a particular vegetable comes in multiple variants, such as green beans (whole, cut, diagonally cut, and French style). The old design featured a plain sans-serif font in a dark color on a solid white background, resulting in good contrast and readability. The new design, however, is a clear regression; it trades the consistent, easily readable font for a hodgepodge of different heavily-stylized display fonts on a busier background with lower contrast, which results in much worse readability. This loss of readability makes it take longer to locate a particular product on the shelf.