<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Automatic Camera Clock Synchronization under Linux	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://mpetroff.net/2015/08/automatic-camera-clock-synchronization-under-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://mpetroff.net/2015/08/automatic-camera-clock-synchronization-under-linux/</link>
	<description>mpetroff.net</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 08:10:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Wilhelm Spickermann		</title>
		<link>https://mpetroff.net/2015/08/automatic-camera-clock-synchronization-under-linux/#comment-302720</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilhelm Spickermann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 08:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mpetroff.net/?p=1950#comment-302720</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have a similar problem with a &quot;Canon Powershot SX70HS&quot; using OpenSuse Leap 15.6.

  gphoto2 --set-config datetimeutc=now

synchronized the camera (using &quot;datetimeutc&quot; without setting TZ).

But checking the time by taking a picture of a precise clock revealed a difference of 1.3 seconds and 1.6 seconds on the next try. That&#039;s worse than setting by hand. Never expected that!

As the KDE clock seconds display is delayed rather often, I&#039;ve used a program I&#039;ve written in Ada which also shows two digits below the seconds without obscuring these digits by a too long exposure time of the camera. The program was tested against
 xclock -digital -update 1 -strftime &quot;%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S&quot;

So the clock pictures taken allow the comparison of times including the EXIF &quot;subsecond&quot; variable. 

So I&#039;ll continue to use clock pictures and use exiftool for time correction of the pictures taken.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a similar problem with a &#8220;Canon Powershot SX70HS&#8221; using OpenSuse Leap 15.6.</p>
<p>  gphoto2 &#8211;set-config datetimeutc=now</p>
<p>synchronized the camera (using &#8220;datetimeutc&#8221; without setting TZ).</p>
<p>But checking the time by taking a picture of a precise clock revealed a difference of 1.3 seconds and 1.6 seconds on the next try. That&#8217;s worse than setting by hand. Never expected that!</p>
<p>As the KDE clock seconds display is delayed rather often, I&#8217;ve used a program I&#8217;ve written in Ada which also shows two digits below the seconds without obscuring these digits by a too long exposure time of the camera. The program was tested against<br />
 xclock -digital -update 1 -strftime &#8220;%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S&#8221;</p>
<p>So the clock pictures taken allow the comparison of times including the EXIF &#8220;subsecond&#8221; variable. </p>
<p>So I&#8217;ll continue to use clock pictures and use exiftool for time correction of the pictures taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn0.mpetroff.net
Minified using Disk

Served from: mpetroff.net @ 2026-03-30 09:32:55 by W3 Total Cache
-->