<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Using Marine Gravity Anomaly Map with Mapbox GL	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://mpetroff.net/2014/10/marine-gravity-mapbox-gl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://mpetroff.net/2014/10/marine-gravity-mapbox-gl/</link>
	<description>mpetroff.net</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 23:28:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Matthew Petroff		</title>
		<link>https://mpetroff.net/2014/10/marine-gravity-mapbox-gl/#comment-234979</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Petroff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mpetroff.net/?p=1582#comment-234979</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://mpetroff.net/2014/10/marine-gravity-mapbox-gl/#comment-234896&quot;&gt;Anna&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m guessing it has to do with the ESRI / GDAL difference you mention. I just loaded the image and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.naturalearthdata.com/downloads/10m-physical-vectors/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Natural Earth coastline data&lt;/a&gt; in QGIS, which uses GDAL, and the datasets match up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://mpetroff.net/2014/10/marine-gravity-mapbox-gl/#comment-234896">Anna</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing it has to do with the ESRI / GDAL difference you mention. I just loaded the image and the <a href="http://www.naturalearthdata.com/downloads/10m-physical-vectors/" rel="nofollow">Natural Earth coastline data</a> in QGIS, which uses GDAL, and the datasets match up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anna		</title>
		<link>https://mpetroff.net/2014/10/marine-gravity-mapbox-gl/#comment-234896</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mpetroff.net/?p=1582#comment-234896</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Matthew,

I loaded your curv-fp.tif-file over the GEBCO bathymetry in ArcGIS and find there is a (I think)
continuous offset of about 20km. Your data seems to be shifted 20km to the north. I compared with 
my curv-tif-file I converted in GMT and find the same offset. 
I don&#039;t understand what is happening when you reencode the data in CDO, but maybe something during 
projecting back and forth produced that offset.
Or it is an issue of the different definitions of web mercator in ESRI and GDAL ?!- see: 
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/3962
Maybe you could check that and maybe tell me I am wrong :),

cheers,
Anna]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matthew,</p>
<p>I loaded your curv-fp.tif-file over the GEBCO bathymetry in ArcGIS and find there is a (I think)<br />
continuous offset of about 20km. Your data seems to be shifted 20km to the north. I compared with<br />
my curv-tif-file I converted in GMT and find the same offset.<br />
I don&#8217;t understand what is happening when you reencode the data in CDO, but maybe something during<br />
projecting back and forth produced that offset.<br />
Or it is an issue of the different definitions of web mercator in ESRI and GDAL ?!- see:<br />
<a href="https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/3962" rel="nofollow ugc">https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/3962</a><br />
Maybe you could check that and maybe tell me I am wrong :),</p>
<p>cheers,<br />
Anna</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matthew Petroff		</title>
		<link>https://mpetroff.net/2014/10/marine-gravity-mapbox-gl/#comment-234722</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Petroff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 14:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mpetroff.net/?p=1582#comment-234722</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://mpetroff.net/2014/10/marine-gravity-mapbox-gl/#comment-234721&quot;&gt;Anna&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for the tip. I&#039;m familiar with GDAL but not GMT, so I only used GMT for what I couldn&#039;t do with GDAL.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://mpetroff.net/2014/10/marine-gravity-mapbox-gl/#comment-234721">Anna</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for the tip. I&#8217;m familiar with GDAL but not GMT, so I only used GMT for what I couldn&#8217;t do with GDAL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anna		</title>
		<link>https://mpetroff.net/2014/10/marine-gravity-mapbox-gl/#comment-234721</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 13:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mpetroff.net/?p=1582#comment-234721</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Matthew,
With &lt;code&gt;img2grd&lt;/code&gt; in GMT you can directly convert to geotiff. To get a geographic lon/lat grid use: &lt;code&gt;img2grd curv.img.23.1 -Gcurv.tiff=gd: GTiFF -Rd&lt;/code&gt;. So you don&#039;t have to reproject and you can do it in one step...
Cheers Anna]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matthew,<br />
With <code>img2grd</code> in GMT you can directly convert to geotiff. To get a geographic lon/lat grid use: <code>img2grd curv.img.23.1 -Gcurv.tiff=gd: GTiFF -Rd</code>. So you don&#8217;t have to reproject and you can do it in one step&#8230;<br />
Cheers Anna</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matthew Petroff		</title>
		<link>https://mpetroff.net/2014/10/marine-gravity-mapbox-gl/#comment-233737</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Petroff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 19:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mpetroff.net/?p=1582#comment-233737</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://mpetroff.net/2014/10/marine-gravity-mapbox-gl/#comment-233733&quot;&gt;BD Andrews&lt;/a&gt;.

The image seems fine to me, although, for whatever reason, the download took a very long time to start.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://mpetroff.net/2014/10/marine-gravity-mapbox-gl/#comment-233733">BD Andrews</a>.</p>
<p>The image seems fine to me, although, for whatever reason, the download took a very long time to start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn0.mpetroff.net
Minified using Disk

Served from: mpetroff.net @ 2026-03-28 19:30:53 by W3 Total Cache
-->